Programs
    About Us
    Donate
    Let‘s Connect
    Graphic of workers
    Organizational CultureArticle

    What is Employee Engagement?

    by Leading Edge

    Leading Edge defines “employee engagement” as being motivated to do your best work, proud to work at your organization, likely to stay working there, and likely to recommend your organization to others as a place to work.

    Why does employee engagement matter?

    Simply put: If you want your organization to succeed, you need your people engaged and thriving.

    Employee engagement has a proven relationship with organizational success. Among the vast body of research supporting this conclusion is Gallup’s The Relationship Between Engagement at Work and Organizational Outcomes, a meta-analysis of 456 research studies covering more than 2.7 million employees at 276 organizations in 54 industries in 96 countries. Gallup found that employee engagement is significantly correlated with, among many other metrics:

    • Productivity
    • Profitability
    • Employee turnover
    • Safety incidents (accidents)
    • Absenteeism
    • Product quality
    • and more.

    Everyone loves engagement. But definitions vary.

    Where definitions of engagement differ most is in where they draw the line between what's "engagement" vs. what's a part of the employee’s experience that might contribute to engagement, with some (like Gallup) drawing that line broadly and others (like Qualtrics) more narrowly.

    What all definitions of engagement share is the goal of capturing the magical quality of being really “into” your job and likely to do your best work for your organization.

    How engaged are employees in the Jewish nonprofit sector?

    Our most recent data on engagement across the Jewish nonprofit sector comes from April 2024.

    Jewish nonprofit employee engagement is at 75%. That’s good, but it could be better. Looking at the individual questions with which Leading Edge measures employee engagement shows how:

    Charts. I feel proud to work for my organization: 87%. I would recommend my organization as a great place to work: 75%. My organization helps me stay motivated to do my best work: 72%. I see myself still working at my organization in two years: 66%.
    In the charts above, the "U.S. Benchmark" refers to a benchmark determined by data from Culture Amp, our survey platform partner.

    Employees at Jewish nonprofits are overwhelmingly proud to work for their organizations. But the other three engagement questions show significant room for growth.

    It’s particularly concerning that the Jewish nonprofit workers we surveyed are less likely than the average American worker to say that they would recommend their organization as a great place to work. This question, akin to the “Net Promoter Score,” is a key barometer for any organization, and for this question, our sector’s favorability score is 6 percentage points below Culture Amp’s U.S. benchmark.

    How has Jewish nonprofit engagement changed over time?

    Jewish nonprofit engagement has held quite steady over the past five years, although there was a field-wide dip in 2022, which we interpret as being related to the “Great Resignation” (or, as our former Chief Strategy Officer Amy Born called it, “The Great Whatever”).

    Engagement over time. 2019: 14%. 2021: 75%. 2022 dips down to 70%. 2023 rises back up to 75%. 2024 remains at 75%.

    Engagement held steady after October 7th. Remarkably, employee engagement held steady from Spring 2023 to Spring 2024, despite the upheavals of October 7th and a global upsurge in antisemitism. To learn how we understand and contextualize that finding, read our Jewish Workforce Snapshot: Spring 2024.

    Support employees through the "engagement crater."

    Charting employee engagement across tenure at organizations, we see a striking pattern. At each end of the tenure spectrum, brand new employees (under one year of tenure) and employees who have been at the organization for more than 10 years are both more likely to be engaged than employees with between one and 10 years of tenure. This basic pattern has recurred over multiple years of our surveys; the following chart shows one example, based on 2023 data:

    Chart of employee engagement by tenure. Less than 1 year: 80%. 1 through 7 to 10 years: 73%. 10 or more years: 77%.

    Explaining the engagement crater. Brand-new employees often enjoy the novelty of a new workplace. They know all the positive things about the organization that led them to join it, without yet knowing the drawbacks. Engagement drops during the first few years, as the “honeymoon” ends and the employee gets to know the organization’s flaws. At the same time, as new employees are seen less as “exciting new faces” around the organization, managers and colleagues may not give them as much encouragement and validation as they did when they were brand new. Employees may begin to feel taken for granted. As more time goes by, those less engaged are more likely to find opportunities to leave. Those who were more engaged all along are more likely to stay and may also develop and refine strategies to make the best of the unique quirks and challenges in their organization.

    How to address the “engagement crater?” Support midtenure and new employees. Clearly, mid-tenure employees could use more support from their organizations. At the same time, newer employees represent key opportunities to break the “engagement crater” pattern in the next “generation” of employees. Leaders and managers can make a special effort to speak with and listen to new employees before their engagement crater begins, and to proactively, explicitly prepare them to navigate challenges as the “honeymoon” period of their employment wears off. Discussing this pattern openly and setting expectations of honest, respectful communication about addressing challenges might set up both employees and their managers to prevent the engagement crater—or, at least, make it a bit less steep.

    Logo for Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

    © 2024. This Leading Edge resource can be shared under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No-Derivatives International License 4.0.

    Related Resources

    View the Resource Library

      Contact Us

      ©2024 Leading Edge
      Built by Ronik